Below is an infographic I've made for my English Composition 1 class explaining the Compare and Contrast essay assignment for my visual learners.
Higher Education must adapt to an exponential increase in a Neurodiverse student body.
Monday, February 24, 2014
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
How will the Inclusion Plan affect Higher Education in the future?
A school in New York City is expanding the definition of diversity, and putting kids of varying developmental ability side-by-side in the classroom. The IDEAL School of Manhattan is breaking new ground on inclusion education, creating an environment where students with developmental disabilities are never pulled out of class, and are taught the same lessons as students without special needs.
Alex Wagner visited the IDEAL School and discusses the idea of “neurodiversity” with the NOW panel.
What we see in schools today is what we will need to address in Higher Education in just a few years. Are we prepared to accept into the college classroom students who are learning different in the ways that K-12 schools are today? Could colleges adapt the Inclusion Plan for higher education students?
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Using Infographics in the College Classroom - Course Intro
This infographic is used on the D2L homepage of my Comp 1 Classes. It's includes basic information about grades - listed in bar graph form.
Monday, February 10, 2014
Sunday, February 9, 2014
The Proposed Autism ID Card and It's Educational Implications
And the truth is - neither are we.
In the recent blog post, Autism and Disclosure: Is Virginia's Autism'ID Card Ethical?, William Stillman explains that there is considerable concern regarding a proposed state ID card that would help police identify Autistic drivers they may pull over. While I can see the benefits of an ID card for those who are not educated on behaviors attributed to Autistic people, I see this - quite obviously - as a slippery slope to forced identification and discrimination.
Remember that what makes an officer's (or teacher's) job easier is not always the ethical thing to do as it pertains to a person's rights. We must always be mindful of an individual's civil rights. And their feelings.
As college educators, we deal with young adults who are just finding their way in the world. Our DS offices help students learn to self advocate, but they should not push or force - and neither should we.
In his post, Stillman encourages others to keep a few things in mind when dealing with neurodiverse people:
The next time you feel entitled or obligated to disclose information about someone with a "different way of being in the world," whether that person is in your presence or not, please ask yourself:
1. Do I have prior permission from the individual to do so?
2. Is what I'm about to share gentle, respectful, private or even necessary?
3. Would I be willing to say the exact same thing about myself in exactly the same forum--or have others say it about me without my prior consent and without a way to defend myself?
4. Is there a more discreet manner in which to share the information, such as texting or emailing sensitive information to vocational, educational, medical or school personnel?
2. Is what I'm about to share gentle, respectful, private or even necessary?
3. Would I be willing to say the exact same thing about myself in exactly the same forum--or have others say it about me without my prior consent and without a way to defend myself?
4. Is there a more discreet manner in which to share the information, such as texting or emailing sensitive information to vocational, educational, medical or school personnel?
This is good advice - for college faculty and staff.
Saturday, February 8, 2014
Using Infographics in College Classes
I've started using Infographics as a way to re-inforce my essay assignments for students. I don't see Infographics as "dumbing down" material. The feedback I've received from students has been all positive. These don't take the place of the original assignment sheet, but they do supplement what we have discussed in class - adding to the student's understanding of what is expected.
Below is the Infographic for Essay 1 - Personal Narrative
Below is the Infographic for Essay 1 - Personal Narrative
Wednesday, February 5, 2014
Do we allow the stigma of neurological differences to dictate our teaching methods?
Obviously, as teachers we are shaped by our preconceived notions. I have had to re-think my teaching methods many times (and grow as a person) when I have taken an honest look at the ways my preconceived notions have held me back. It's easy to get stuck in a teaching "comfort zone." And it's harder to stop, step back, and self police ourselves - especially when the little feedback we get as teachers comes once or twice a year - and even then, we are rated as Satisfactory or Not Satisfactory.
Most college instructors I know are constantly changing and trying new methods - because they believe in improving what they do. I wonder though, if there needs to be a shift in thinking - away from the stigma of neurological differences first. I can try a million different ways to teach Plato, but if I don't step back and think about accessibility to that material for students whose talents (and challenges) are fundamentally different than those "neurotypical" students, I'm not really changing things for the better.
(I should mention that I am having a difficult time these days thinking that there is such a thing as a true neurotypical student because we all think differently. I mean, what does "neurotypical" mean anyway and are there any concrete ways to even measure it?)
Charles L. Arnold in a video for The Museum of Science and Sustainability discusses the stigma associated with some forms of Neurodiversity. To him, this is becoming a civil rights issue. I think that Mr. Arnold brings up something very interesting that goes beyond the issue of public shaming those with neurological differences. The larger issue here is that we are lacking an empathy for difference that we have seen historically with gender/race/orientation rights.
Higher education certainly has experienced a shift in thinking as more diverse students enroll. Issues with Neurodiversity is no different. Unfortunately, and as history has shown, most institutions are lagging behind and will have to play administrative and instructional catch-up to deal with the needs of a growing population of Neurodiverse students who demand (and deserve) accommodations particular to their needs.
Most college instructors I know are constantly changing and trying new methods - because they believe in improving what they do. I wonder though, if there needs to be a shift in thinking - away from the stigma of neurological differences first. I can try a million different ways to teach Plato, but if I don't step back and think about accessibility to that material for students whose talents (and challenges) are fundamentally different than those "neurotypical" students, I'm not really changing things for the better.
(I should mention that I am having a difficult time these days thinking that there is such a thing as a true neurotypical student because we all think differently. I mean, what does "neurotypical" mean anyway and are there any concrete ways to even measure it?)
Charles L. Arnold in a video for The Museum of Science and Sustainability discusses the stigma associated with some forms of Neurodiversity. To him, this is becoming a civil rights issue. I think that Mr. Arnold brings up something very interesting that goes beyond the issue of public shaming those with neurological differences. The larger issue here is that we are lacking an empathy for difference that we have seen historically with gender/race/orientation rights.
Higher education certainly has experienced a shift in thinking as more diverse students enroll. Issues with Neurodiversity is no different. Unfortunately, and as history has shown, most institutions are lagging behind and will have to play administrative and instructional catch-up to deal with the needs of a growing population of Neurodiverse students who demand (and deserve) accommodations particular to their needs.
Monday, February 3, 2014
Books on Neurodiversity: Neurodiversity by Thomas Armstrong
(from the book's Amazon page)
A new term has emerged from the disability movement in the past decade to help change the way we think about neurological disorders: Neurodiversity.
ADHD. Dyslexia. Autism. The number of categories of illnesses listed by the American Psychiatric Association has tripled in the past fifty years. With so many people affected by our growing “culture of disabilities,” it no longer makes sense to hold on to the deficit-ridden idea of neuropsychological illness.
With the sensibility of Oliver Sacks and Kay Redfield Jamison, psychologist Thomas Armstrong offers a revolutionary perspective that reframes many neuropsychological disorders as part of the natural diversity of the human brain rather than as definitive illnesses. Neurodiversity emphasizes their positive dimensions, showing how people with ADHD, bipolar disorder, and other conditions have inherent evolutionary advantages that, matched with the appropriate environment or ecological niche, can help them achieve dignity and wholeness in their lives.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




